Rick Warren has written a best selling book encouraging people to draw near God. This has been sorely needed and long over due in Christendom. His ingenious abilities to organize and socialize people into community is a powerful tool for evangelism. Christianity needs to utilize these tools for that purpose.
As great as these tools are they are not an all in one system for all ministries in the church. Unfortunately, this is exactly what Warren is now promoting, skillfully organizing an entire church structure around his five fold groupings of worship, fellowship, discipleship, evangelism, ministry. Home groups led by lay people without giftings for leadership or teaching are under the umbrella of discipleship with the doctrinal teachings done by Saddleback videos. And this is a problem. Videos, no matter how informative cannot take the place of gifted called leaders and teachers.
This is likely making Mr. Warren a multimillionaire as well as SaddleBack. What it is not doing is building up the church in learning how to study Scripture. Spoon fed mini portions of prepared breakfast cereal does not teach one how to cook for themselves. It leaves them dependent upon the feeder and the product.
This is a grave problem. Some churches and skilled individuals need to step up to the plate and call the church at large back to diligent Berean Bible Study. Home groups are good but when it is being said that they can be led by anyone, then the true leaders and teachers are left with no one to lead and teach. These home groups take up precious time that could be used sending people to real Bible Studies where they would learn proper methods of researching and studying the Scriptures.
What do you think?
I see the validity and necessity of social functions peppered with small doses of Bible Truths which are very effective in drawing in new converts and young Christians to the fellowship of the body of Christ. They get people talking who normally might not. They get people who rarely pick up a Bible outside of church (and often not even there) to read some Scripture.
The problem is that by the church immersing herself in these programs and keeping all Home Groups the same, functioning the same, reading the same material it doesn't fully encourage the gifts and ministries that Scripture says the Holy Spirit desires. And by plunking every available body into only the teachings of Rick Warren, all we get are Rick Warren clones, mixed in with a lot of bored more mature Christians hungering for some meat.
Is there an answer to utilize Rick Warren's worthy organizational structure without being swallowed up by it?
T. King
I understand that Rick Warren's church has a huge number of small groups, thus the video solution for that church, providing something the small group leaders could use that had uniformity of message and approach. Warren has a passion and dedication to aiding pastors, so it's natural that he'd want to make materials developed for his church available for other pastors and churches.
As for the monetary gain, Warren has made millions already with his books. I don't know if he even gets any money from the videos. He does give most of what he makes from his books to his Purpose Driven Ministries programs. He also reverse tithes, and has reimbursed his church for his salary for all of the twenty some years he's been pastor there.
It seems to me that if local churches like using the Warren videos they need to make sure they are optional, not the only small group format available, and allow for wide diversity in their study groups. Also, there needs to be substantial and solid Bible study available in the regular services.
If Warren's small group program appeals as an easy way to add a spiritual component to small group meetings--which may be largely supportive and social in nature--they need to be but a minor part of the total church menu for the care and feeding of the local flock.
Posted by: Pat Gundry | April 21, 2006 at 12:46 AM
That is pretty impressive about the reverse tithes.
I agree with your conclusion that the material used in the small groups need to be optional. Unfortunately, I wonder how many churches understand that. My impression is that there are quite a few churches that are building their entire church structure around the Purpose Driven theme and Small Groups.
Posted by: TL | April 21, 2006 at 03:07 AM
P.S. my concern about the large amount of money being generated is that I see some who view the potential of making money as a good reason to structure their whole church after Warren's patterns seeing how well it worked for Saddleback. It must be difficult for pastors who rely so heavily upon members tithes to not be concerned about the number of potential tithers. More members means more money coming in. Warren's structure promises more members.
Posted by: TL | April 22, 2006 at 10:23 PM
I feel the same way about Beth Moore. We keep having women's "bible studies" at my church but they don't bear the stamp of the authentic Berean spirit of discipleship I long for. I don't sign up for them, and I feel judged because I don't want to spend my time that way. We are so consumer-driven! Whose responsibility is it to divide the word of truth? Ours, our Beth Moore's or Rick Warren's?
Posted by: Beyond Words | May 17, 2006 at 03:26 PM
There is big business in curriculum these days. But you have to have a big company behind you and then you all make money. Many do pretty well in presenting Bible truths but some have their own pet doctrines to load out. And the church general hasn't a clue that some Bible groups are feeding them bias, prejudice, personal gain instead of a broken heart just wanting to bring light to the world.
Beth Moore isn't all that bad. I've read one of her studies and now checking out her new "Patriarchs" study. She may not be as deep as some, but she has charisma and a real desire to preach/teach the Word. As long as she doesn't get strange and stays away from the hierarchalist dogma, she's fine with me.
Posted by: Teri | May 17, 2006 at 04:58 PM